This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different irrigation methods in the endodontic treatment of lower permanent molars. We conducted a randomized controlled trial with eighty patients who were randomly divided into four groups.

Dental procedures, dental technology

 

The patients received treatment from an experienced endodontist over two sessions. The following irrigation methods were used:

  1. Traditional root canal irrigation.
  2. Irrigation activation using sound. The solution in the root canal is agitated, allowing for better removal of pulp remnants.
  3. Irradiation with a 980 nm diode laser and traditional irrigation.
  4. Irradiation with a 980 nm diode laser and irrigation activation using ultrasonic.

Dental procedures, dental technology

The level of pain was then assessed after the procedure at 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days following access and chemomechanical preparation on the first visit.

Patient Selection

Eighty patients seeking treatment at the Biruni University Endodontics Department participated in the study. Healthy adult patients experiencing moderate to severe pain (self-rated from 4 to 10 on a pain scale of 0 to 10) at the start of treatment, as well as patients diagnosed with symptomatic apical periodontitis and a negative cold test for the lower molar, were selected.

How to avoid the use of a removable denture and reduce the load in the healing process on multi unit

Data Analysis

Qualitative data was analyzed using a chi-square test, Fisher’s exact chi-square test, and Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon test were used to assess inter-group and intra-group parameters.

Results

The study showed that patients in all groups experienced a statistically significant reduction in pain levels after the procedure. However, different irrigation methods did not lead to statistically significant differences in pain levels. There were also no statistically significant differences based on gender or age. Statistical significance was achieved at p < 0.05.

Conclusions

The use of sound activation of irrigation and irradiation with a 980 nm diode laser did not result in a significant reduction in postoperative pain in adult lower permanent molars during endodontic treatment compared to traditional irrigation methods. Thus, the claim that sound activation of irrigation and laser application reduces postoperative pain was not confirmed. However, this does not mean that these methods are ineffective in improving root canal disinfection. This issue requires further investigation.

Disclaimer: Any medical or scientific information provided in connection with the content presented here makes no claim to completeness and the topicality, accuracy and balance of such information provided is not guaranteed. The information provided by Uniqa Dental Ltd. does not constitute medical advice or recommendation and is in no way a substitute for professional advice from a physician, dentist or other healthcare professional and must not be used as a basis for diagnosis or for selecting, starting, changing or stopping medical treatment. Physicians, dentists and other healthcare professionals are solely responsible for the individual medical assessment of each case and for their medical decisions, selection and application of diagnostic methods, medical protocols, treatments and products. Uniqa Dental Ltd. does not accept any liability for any inconvenience or damage resulting from the use of the content and information presented here. Products or treatments shown may not be available in all countries and different information may apply in different countries. For country-specific information please refer to our customer service or a distributor or partner of Uniqa Dental Ltd. in your region.
Curatorial Yurij
Curatorial Yurij
Head of Content at Uniqa Dental As an expert in dental industry, my task is to tell in a simple and fascinating way about complex highly organized series of procedures for the benefit of practitioners.